1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 648 F.Supp.
  5. 648 F.Supp. 1212 (1986)
 

HARKINS AMUSEMENT v. HARRY NACE CO.

No. Civ. 80-790 PHX CLH.

648 F.Supp. 1212 (1986)

HARKINS AMUSEMENT ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. The HARRY NACE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

November 7, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin Tobolowsky, N. Henry Simpson, Tobolowsky, Prager & Schlinger, Dallas, Tex., David N. Farren, Shimmel, Hill, Bishop & Gruender, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff.

Sue K. McDonnell, Donavan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, Los Angeles, Cal., for Buena Vista Dist. Co.

John P. Frank, Charles G. Case II, George L. Paul, Lewis & Roca, Phoenix, Ariz., for Certain Dist. Defendants.

Robert C. Hackett, David W. Dow, Mohr, Hackett, Pederson, Blakley, Randolph & Haga, P.C., Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant American Multi-Cinema, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HARDY, District Judge.

The Court has had under advisement the motion of defendants Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., DeLaurentis Entertainment Group, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, Twentieth-Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal City Studios, Inc., Warner Bros. Distributing Corporation, United Artists Corporation, Orion Pictures Corporation and United Film Distributors (hereinafter referred to collectively as "the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases