1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 636 F.Supp.
  5. 636 F.Supp. 1193 (1986)
 

BLACK & DECKER INC. v. PITTWAY CORP.

No. 85 C 1517.

636 F.Supp. 1193 (1986)

BLACK & DECKER INC. and Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc., Plaintiffs, v. PITTWAY CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

May 16, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. VanSanten, Wood, Dalton, Phillips, Mason & Rowe, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

James M. Amend, Andrew C. Holcomb, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Black & Decker Inc. and Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. (collectively "B & D," treated as a singular noun after this sentence) have sued Pittway Corporation ("Pittway") for patent infringement. Pittway now moves under Fed.R.Civ.P. ("Rule") 56 for summary judgment.1 For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, Pittway's motion is granted.

Facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases