PETERSEN v. SAIF

WCB 83-05423; CA A33543.

714 P.2d 1108 (1986)

In the matter of the Compensation of Clara J. PETERSEN, Claimant. Clara J. Petersen, Petitioner, v. SAIF Corporation, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 26, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on brief were Nicholas M. Sencer and Malagon & Associates, Eugene.

Darrell E. Bewley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Judge.

This is an occupational disease claim in which claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board decision which affirmed the referee's determination that claimant's mental disorder is not compensable. On de novo review, we reverse.

In February, 1983, claimant, a billing clerk for the city of Myrtle Point, filed a claim form indicating that she was unable to work due to "stress, job harassment and undermining of the city administrator...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases