1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 653 F.Supp.
  5. 653 F.Supp. 1070 (1986)
 

URSETH v. CITY OF DAYTON

No. C-3-84-103.

653 F.Supp. 1070 (1986)

Anomi R. URSETH, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DAYTON, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D.

August 18, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irving Saul, Dayton, Ohio, E. John Wist, A. Melvin Kemmer, Tipp City, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Neil F. Freund, Jane M. Lynch, Dayton, Ohio, for defendants.

ENTRY DETERMINING APPLICABILITY OF OHIO REVISED CODE SECTION 2744.01 ET SEQ. TO THE INSTANT ACTION

RICE, District Judge.

This Court has already set forth in open Court, in its ruling denying Defendant City of Dayton's Motion for Directed Verdict, its conclusions as to the applicability of Ohio Revised Code Section 2744.01, et seq., upon the instant action. This entry merely serves to journalize, for the convenience of counsel, the reasoning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases