1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 626 F.Supp.
  5. 626 F.Supp. 1062 (1986)
 

D.G. RUNG INDUSTRIES, INC. v. TINNERMAN

No. C85-881D.

626 F.Supp. 1062 (1986)

D.G. RUNG INDUSTRIES, INC., a Washington corporation, and Darrell G. Rung, Plaintiffs, v. Ed TINNERMAN and Jane Doe Tinnerman, husband and wife, and their marital community, d/b/a Service Equipment Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington.

January 17, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce M. Brooks, Garvey, Schubert, Adams & Barer, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs.

Bruce Kaser, Seattle, Wash., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DIMMICK, District Judge.

Defendant Ed Tinnerman has moved for dismissal of patent infringement and related state claims brought by D.G. Rung Industries, Inc. and Darrell G. Rung ("Rung"). The Court heard oral argument and has considered the memoranda, affidavits and exhibits filed by counsel.1 The Court concludes that plaintiff's claim of infringement is not properly before the Court, and therefore dismisses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases