1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 104 N.J.
  5. 104 N.J. 59 (1986)
 

MATTER OF TUSO

104 N.J. 59 (1986)

514 A.2d 1311

IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS K.J. TUSO, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided September 26, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robyn M. Hill, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Vincent J. Pancari argued the cause on behalf of respondent (Pancari, Zerella, Tedesco & Pancari, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before us to consider the Decision and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB or Board) determining that respondent, Thomas K.J. Tuso, was guilty of ethical misconduct deserving of disbarment. The Board rendered its determination on a motion for final discipline filed by the Office of Attorney Ethics. The basis for the motion was respondent's convictions in April 1977 of conspiracy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases