1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 638 F.Supp.
  5. 638 F.Supp. 872 (1986)
 

RUSH v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC.

84 Civ. 3219 (RWS).

638 F.Supp. 872 (1986)

R. Stockton RUSH, III, Plaintiff, v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC. and Scott Seskis, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 25, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Lovell, P.C., New York City, for plaintiff; Christopher Lovell, of counsel.

Gold, Farrell & Marks, New York City, for defendants; Martin R. Gold, Robert P. Mulvey, of counsel.

SWEET, District Judge.

Upon remand, plaintiff R. Stockton Rush III ("Rush") now seeks a jury trial on the issue of fraudulent inducement of the arbitration agreement, a request opposed by defendants Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. ("Oppenheimer") and Scott Seskis ("Seskis") on the ground that there is no material factual basis for asserting such a defense to the arbitration agreement. Upon the memoranda and affidavits submitted and for the following reasons, Rush's request...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases