MATTSON v. ROCHESTER SILO, INC.

No. C6-86-792.

397 N.W.2d 909 (1986)

Rickey V. and Pamela J. MATTSON, Respondents, v. ROCHESTER SILO, INC., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted March 13, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William P. Luther, Luther, Ballenthin & Carruthers, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Victor Kreuziger, Elizabeth A. Holden, Bruce D. Elliott, Cousineau, McGuire, Shaughnessy & Anderson, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and SEDGWICK and LANSING, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Respondents Rickey and Pamela Mattson brought this action, seeking to recover for damage to their farming operation resulting from the purchase of a silo from appellant Rochester Silo (Rochester). The jury returned a special verdict in favor of the Mattsons on breach of warranty and negligence claims. Rochester moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, but the trial court found that notice of the motion had not been served...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases