1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 629 F.Supp.
  5. 629 F.Supp. 602 (1986)
 

BYRD v. PROCTOR & GAMBLE MFG. CO.

Civ. A. No. 83-131.

629 F.Supp. 602 (1986)

Brenda BYRD and James Byrd, Plaintiffs, v. The PROCTOR & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING CO., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Covington Division.

March 3, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marcus S. Carey, Fort Mitchell, Ky., for plaintiffs.

Carl J. Stich, Jr., Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants.

OPINION

BERTELSMAN, District Judge.

The defendant, The Proctor & Gamble Company, has filed a motion for Judgment N.O.V. or for a new trial, following a verdict for the plaintiffs in the total amount of $16,470.00, in this products liability action.1

This action arises from the plaintiff Brenda Byrd's loss of the majority of her hair following her using Proctor & Gamble's Lilt home permanent. The case presents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases