1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 648 F.Supp.
  5. 648 F.Supp. 582 (1986)
 

BERGEN v. ROTHSCHILD

Civ. A. No. 83-3616.

648 F.Supp. 582 (1986)

Stephen W. BERGEN and Anne Virginia Bergen, Plaintiffs, v. L.F. ROTHSCHILD, Unterberg, Towbin, and Bennett Mostel, Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

August 8, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard J. Cooney, Silver Spring, Md., for plaintiffs.

Jonathan Eisenberg, Richard A. Graham, Washington, D.C., for defendants.

OPINION

JOHN GARRETT PENN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the defendants' motions to dismiss the amended complaint.1 The defendants have filed separate but substantively similar motions. It is well established that a complaint should not be dismissed "unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief." Conley v. Gibson,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases