BOEHM v. MOENCH

No. CA 85-313.

718 S.W.2d 491 (1986)

19 Ark.App. 218

George BOEHM d/b/a Boehm & Associates, Appellant, v. Lorin MOENCH d/b/a Moench Investment Company, Ltd., Appellee. Ltd., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, En Banc.

November 5, 1986.


PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs in this case, we find that both the appellant's and appellee's abstracts flagrantly violate Ark. R.Sup.Ct. and Ct.App. 9(d). The appellant failed to include in his abstract the pleadings and the judgment from which he appeals. The appellee's supplemental abstract is not an impartial condensation of the records, as the appellee consistently underscores portions of the testimony, a practice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases