1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 475 U.S.
  5. 475 U.S. 709 (1986)
 

ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC. v. WORTHINGTON

No. 85-195.

475 U.S. 709 (1986)

106 S.Ct. 1527

89 L.Ed.2d 739

ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC. v. WORTHINGTON ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 21, 1986

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clemens H. Barnes argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were James D. Rolfe and Erik Rosenquist.

Carson F. Eller argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.*

JUSTICE REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the Court.

Respondents sued their employer, petitioner Icicle Seafoods, Inc., to recover overtime benefits to which they thought they were entitled under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U. S. C. § 207(a)(1). After a 2-day trial, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington held that respondents were excluded from the overtime benefits of the FLSA by 29 U. S. C. § 213(b)(6), which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases