1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 724 P.2d
  5. 724 P.2d 338 (1986)
 

HERTEL v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION

85-AB-1150; CA A37224.

724 P.2d 338 (1986)

80 Or. App. 784

Joseph A. HERTEL, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION and Viking Industries, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 20, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kathryn S. Augustson, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Reynolds & Johnston, Portland.

Thomas W. Sondag, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Viking Industries. With him on the brief were Richard C. Hunt, Portland, and Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, Anderson & Young, Portland.

No appearance for respondent Employment Div.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and VAN HOOMISSEN, JJ.

VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of an Employment Appeals Board (EAB) decision denying him unemployment compensation on the ground that he voluntarily left work without good cause. ORS 657.176(2)(c).1 EAB concluded that he had not met his burden of showing that he had "no reasonable alternative but to leave work." OAR 471-30-038(4).2 We reverse and remand for reconsideration.3<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases