Carol EVENSIZER, Petitioner on Review,
v.
BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review.
Supreme Court of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted January 30, 1986.
Decided August 5, 1986.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Lawrence J. Hall, Attorney, Public Defender's Office, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. On the briefs was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender.
Scott McAlister, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen.
Arlen P. Smith, Jack Duncan, David E. Powell and Michael Lissy, Oregon State Penitentiary, Salem, filed a brief amicus curiae.
Before PETERSON, C.J., LENT, LINDE, CAMPBELL, CARSON and JONES, JJ., and GILLETTE, J. Pro Tem.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
LENT, Judge.
Like the petitioners in Price v. Board of Parole,301 Or. 393, 723 P.2d 314 (1986), and Martz v. Board of Parole,301 Or. 400, 723 P.2d 317 (1986) (both decided today), this petitioner argues that the Board of Parole (Board) abused its discretion in setting her initial date of release on parole. Unlike Price...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.