EVENSIZER v. BOARD OF PAROLE

CA A34692; SC S32345.

723 P.2d 318 (1986)

301 Or. 403

Carol EVENSIZER, Petitioner on Review, v. BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided August 5, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence J. Hall, Attorney, Public Defender's Office, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. On the briefs was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender.

Scott McAlister, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen.

Arlen P. Smith, Jack Duncan, David E. Powell and Michael Lissy, Oregon State Penitentiary, Salem, filed a brief amicus curiae.

Before PETERSON, C.J., LENT, LINDE, CAMPBELL, CARSON and JONES, JJ., and GILLETTE, J. Pro Tem.


LENT, Judge.

Like the petitioners in Price v. Board of Parole, 301 Or. 393, 723 P.2d 314 (1986), and Martz v. Board of Parole, 301 Or. 400, 723 P.2d 317 (1986) (both decided today), this petitioner argues that the Board of Parole (Board) abused its discretion in setting her initial date of release on parole. Unlike Price...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases