1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 646 F.Supp.
  5. 646 F.Supp. 360 (1986)
 

BURTON v. HEINOLD COMMODITIES, INC.

Civ. A. No. 86-365-N.

646 F.Supp. 360 (1986)

Joseph C. BURTON, Plaintiff, v. HEINOLD COMMODITIES, INC. and C. Peerman Holland, III, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division.

October 2, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Haddad, Clark & Stant, P.C., Virginia Beach, Va., for plaintiff.

Arthur C. Ermlich, Norfolk, Va., for Holland.

William T. Prince, Williams, Worrell, Kelly & Greer, Norfolk, Va., for Heinold Commodities.

OPINION AND ORDER

KELLAM, Senior District Judge.

Defendant Heinold Commodities, Inc. (Heinold) moves this court, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss a portion of Count 1, Count VI (RICO claim), and that portion of the prayer of the complaint in which plaintiff "seeks $100,000.00, compensatory damages for the emotional and mental trama he suffered as a result of the above...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases