1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 609 F.Supp.
  5. 609 F.Supp. 264 (1985)
 

HECHT v. UNITED STATES

Nos. 84 Civ. 8154 (JES), 85 Civ. 3028 (JES).

609 F.Supp. 264 (1985)

Martin E. HECHT, Helen Hecht and the Auravision Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Frank Grau, Charles Vassallo, Howard Barschi, Frank R. Lulich and Rosemary Piper, Defendants. Martin E. HECHT and Helen Hecht, Petitioners, v. DISTRICT DIRECTOR, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 22, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schlesinger & Sussman, New York City, for plaintiffs; Michael Schlesinger, of counsel.

Fishman Forman & Landau, New York City, for plaintiffs; Samuel J. Landau, of counsel.

Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty. for the S.D. of N.Y., New York City, for defendants; Frederick M. Lawrence, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel.

SPRIZZO, District Judge:

Plaintiffs Martin and Helen Hecht have commenced two lawsuits in connection with actions by the Internal Revenue Service regarding the Hechts and Auravision Corp., of which the Hechts are indirectly 100% owners. In the first action, 84 Civ. 8154 (JES), plaintiffs seek to enjoin an IRS investigation and recover damages for alleged harassment and disclosure of confidential information. In the second action, 85 Civ. 3028 (JES), the Hechts challenge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases