LAKIN v. DANIEL MARR & SON CO.

No. 84-408.

126 N.H. 730 (1985)

RICHARD J. LAKIN AND BRENDA LAKIN v. DANIEL MARR & SON CO.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

July 3, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Upton, Sanders & Smith, of Concord (Ernest T. Smith, III, on the brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

Devine, Millimet, Stahl & Branch, of Manchester (Eileen Fox on the brief and orally), for the defendant.


SOUTER, J.

The United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (Loughlin, J.) has certified the following question for our consideration under Supreme Court Rule 34: "Is a workmen's compensation carrier entitled to the recovery of interest on its lien on damages recovered by the injured employee against a liable third person?" We answer no.

The plaintiff was an employee of Pullman Higgins Company working at the Seabrook nuclear power...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases