WHEATLY v. MYUNG SOOK SUH.


207 N.J. Super. 539 (1985)

JAMES J. WHEATLY AND CHARLOTTE L. WHEATLY, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS, v. MYUNG SOOK SUH AND IN SOOK SUH, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS. MAFFUCCI REALTY, INC., PLAINTIFFS, v. MYUNG SOOK SUH AND IN SOOK SUH, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS. U.S.A. TODAY REALTY, INC., PLAINTIFFS, v. MYUNG SOOK SUH AND IN SOOK SUH, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Burlington County.

Decided April 29, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David F. Carlamere for plaintiff Maffucci Realty, Inc. (Carlamere, Rowan & Schemanski, attorneys).

Mary Ann DiCostanza for plaintiff U.S.A. Today Realty, Inc. (M. Bruce MacNaul, attorney).

Sheridan P. Hunt, Jr. for plaintiffs James and Charlotte Wheatly (Sheridan P. Hunt, Jr., attorney).

Robert D. Thompson for defendants Myung Sook Suh and In Sook Suh (Pennington and Thompson, attorneys).


HAINES, A.J.S.C.

This opinion considers:

(1) the application of N.J.S.A. 56:12, the "Plain Language Act" (Act) to a broker-prepared agreement of the sale of residential real estate; (2) requirements concerning the use of the "attorney review clause" in that agreement; and (3) whether the preparation of the agreement constituted the practice of law, inviting civil penalties.

The defendants Myung Sook Suh and In Sook Suh...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases