1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 622 F.Supp.
  5. 622 F.Supp. 119 (1985)
 

MOTION PICTURE LAB. TECH. v. McGREGOR & WERNER, INC.

No. 85 Civ. 1875 (RLC).

622 F.Supp. 119 (1985)

MOTION PICTURE LABORATORY TECHNICIANS LOCAL 780, IATSE, Plaintiff, v. McGREGOR & WERNER, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 21, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Delson & Gordon, New York City, Bernard M. Mamet & Associates, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff; Bernard M. Mamet, of counsel.

Freehill, Hogan & Mahar, New York City, for defendant; Jesse S. Hogg, Allen J. McKenna, Hogg, Allen, Ryce, Norton & Blue, P.A., Coral Gables, Fla., of counsel.

OPINION

ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.

Defendant moves pursuant to Rule 12(b), (1), (2), (3) and (5), F.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of in personam jurisdiction, improper venue and insufficient service of process.

This is a suit seeking to have judgment entered on an arbitration award. The United States Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 9, provides that the parties may specify the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases