1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 200 N.J.
  5. 200 N.J. Super. 538 (1985)
 

MATTER OF WILL OF COHEN

200 N.J. Super. 538 (1985)

491 A.2d 1292

IN THE MATTER OF THE PROBATE OF THE ALLEGED HOLOGRAPHIC WILL OF ESTELLE B. COHEN, DECEASED.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 15, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Rubin argued the cause for appellant (Rubin, Rubin & Malgran, attorneys; David B. Rubin on the brief).

Richard P. Feldman argued the cause for respondent (Kovacs, Horowitz & Rader, attorneys; Richard P. Feldman on the brief).

Before Judges McELROY, DREIER and SHEBELL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by McELROY, P.J.A.D.

Appellant Faye Cohen challenges the probate of the holographic will of her deceased daughter, Estelle Cohen, contending the will is a conditional testamentary disposition void because the condition has not been fulfilled. The trial judge held that Estelle's will was intended to be a permanent testamentary disposition and admitted the will to probate. Faye...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases