1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 172 Cal.App.3d
  5. 172 Cal.App.3d 544 (1985)
 

GEBERT v. YANK

Docket No. B008031.

172 Cal.App.3d 544 (1985)

218 Cal. Rptr. 585

ROSEMARY GEBERT et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. ALBERT YANK, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

September 25, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Rudofsky & Meo, Bernard Grossman and Matthew Meo for Defendant and Appellant.

Butler & Binion and Tom Alexander as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

Kinsella, Boesch, Fujikawa & Towle, Michael C. Denison and Beatriz Olivera Pianko for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

HANSON (Thaxton), J.

By amended complaint, plaintiffs Rosemary Gebert and Florence M. Thuillier sought damages from defendant Albert Yank, Worldwide Bloodstock Agency, a California corporation, and Does I through X. Five causes of action were stated concerning two thoroughbred horses the plaintiff-owners had entrusted to defendant Yank: (1) negligence; (2) breach of a bailment contract; (3) breach of an oral contract; (4)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases