1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 99 N.J.
  5. 99 N.J. 588 (1985)
 

SQUEO v. COMFORT CONTROL CORP.

99 N.J. 588 (1985)

494 A.2d 313

EUGENE M. SQUEO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. COMFORT CONTROL CORP., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 3, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick J. McAuley argued the cause for appellant (Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys, George J. Kenny, of counsel).

Eugene P. Squeo argued the cause for respondent (Schiller, Vyzas, McGill & Squeo, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J.

The primary issue in this workers' compensation case is whether the construction of a self-contained apartment attached to the home of an injured worker's parents may constitute "medical, surgical or other treatment ... necessary to cure and relieve" or "other appliance" under N.J.S.A. 34:15-15 of the Workers' Compensation Act (Act); and if so, whether there is sufficient credible evidence in the record...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases