1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 473 U.S.
  5. 473 U.S. 172 (1985)
 

WILLIAMSON CTY. PLANNING COMM'N v. HAMILTON BANK

No. 84-4.

473 U.S. 172 (1985)

105 S.Ct. 3108

87 L.Ed.2d 126

WILLIAMSON COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION ET AL. v. HAMILTON BANK OF JOHNSON CITY

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 28, 1985

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Estes argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was M. Milton Sweeney.

Edwin S. Kneedler argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Lee, Assistant Attorney General Habicht, Deputy Solicitor General Claiborne, and David C. Shilton.

G. T. Nebel argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Gus Bauman.*

JUSTICE BLACKMUN delivered the opinion of the Court.

Respondent, the owner of a tract of land it was developing as a residential subdivision, sued petitioners, the Williamson County (Tennessee) Regional Planning Commission and its members and staff, in United States District Court, alleging that petitioners' application of various zoning laws and regulations to respondent's property amounted to a "taking" of that property...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases