1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 39 Cal.3d
  5. 39 Cal.3d 523 (1985)
 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. PUBLIC UTIL. COM.

Docket No. S.F. 24687.

39 Cal.3d 523 (1985)

703 P.2d 381

217 Cal. Rptr. 43

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Petitioners, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION et al., Respondents; PACIFIC BELL, Real Party in Interest.

Supreme Court of California.

August 15, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

George Agnost, City Attorney, Leonard L. Snaider, Deputy City Attorney, John Witt, City Attorney, and William S. Shaffran, Deputy City Attorney, for Petitioners.

Janice E. Kerr, Hector Anninos and Walter A. Kessenick for Respondents.

James S. Hamasaki, Duane G. Henry, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Robert M. Westberg and Kevin M. Fong for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

MOSK, J.

The present petition for a writ to review Decision No. 83-10-035 of respondent California Public Utilities Commission (hereinafter the commission) in essence raises a single issue: Did the commission regularly pursue its authority in estimating that real party in interest Pacific Bell, then known as Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company (hereinafter Pacific), would incur...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases