1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 163 Cal.App.3d
  5. 163 Cal.App.3d 387 (1985)
 

MAPLE v. CINCINNATI, INC.

Docket No. B003043.

163 Cal.App.3d 387 (1985)

209 Cal. Rptr. 451

GEORGE MAPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CINCINNATI, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

January 3, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Morgan, Wenzel & McNicholas and Patrick C. Quinlivan for Defendant and Appellant.

Kramer & Celli, Thomas M. Celli, Leonard Sacks and Sat Karam Kaur Khalsa for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

COMPTON, Acting P.J.

Defendant in a personal injury action appeals from an order granting plaintiff a new trial after a jury had returned a verdict in favor of defendant. We reverse.

Plaintiff George Maple suffered injuries while operating a press-brake machine during the course of his employment. The machine was manufactured by defendant Cincinnati, Inc. On May 16, 1983, after deliberating for

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases