1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 99 N.J.
  5. 99 N.J. 402 (1985)
 

WATERFRONT COM'N OF N.Y. HARBOR v. MERCEDES-BENZ

99 N.J. 402 (1985)

493 A.2d 504

WATERFRONT COMMISSION OF NEW YORK HARBOR, ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MERCEDES-BENZ OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 4, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Greenfield, Assistant Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Gerald P. Lally, General Counsel, attorney).

Jeffrey C. Poll argued the cause for respondent (Allan G. Freund, attorney).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.

This case concerns the jurisdiction of the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor (Waterfront Commission or Commission) over certain workers employed by defendant, Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. (Mercedes-Benz or Mercedes), at its automobile-preparation facility in Port Newark. The Chancery Division ruled that these employees were not longshoremen or hiring agents subject to registration or licensing under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases