1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 100 N.J.
  5. 100 N.J. 343 (1985)
 

MATTER OF WEINROTH

100 N.J. 343 (1985)

495 A.2d 417

IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD K. WEINROTH, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided August 7, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Engelhardt, Assistant Ethics Counsel, argued the cause for the Office of Attorney Ethics.

Adrian M. Foley, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

This is an attorney disciplinary case in which the respondent was found to have violated Disciplinary Rule 2-103(C) and Disciplinary Rule 3-102(A). These Rules, respectively, prohibit an attorney from rewarding a lay person who had referred a client to the attorney and from sharing a legal fee with a lay person. A formal ethics committee complaint was filed against respondent on November 22, 1983 charging him with violating these disciplinary rules. Hearings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases