1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 99 N.J.
  5. 99 N.J. 318 (1985)
 

ROSENBERG BY ROSENBERG v. CAHILL

99 N.J. 318 (1985)

492 A.2d 371

LAWRENCE JAMES ROSENBERG, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, LAWRENCE GLENN ROSENBERG, AND LAWRENCE GLENN ROSENBERG, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MICHAEL J. CAHILL, M.D., AND RICHARD MCCARTHY, M.D., DEFENDANTS, AND BRUCE MCELWAIN, D.C., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 13, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis F. Locascio argues the cause for appellant (Drazin and Warshaw, attorneys; Steven L. Kessel, on the brief).

Stuart V. Brod argued the cause for respondent (Pillsbury & Russell, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, J.

This appeal arises from an action for personal injuries assertedly caused by the professional malpractice of a chiropractor. The issues raised call for our consideration of the nature and extent of the professional duty of care that a chiropractor owes to a patient as to matters that in some respects fall outside the scope of chiropractic practice. The more specific question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases