CISCO v. W. C. A. B. (A & P TEA CO.).

No. 2785 C.D. 1983.

88 Pa.Commw. 174 (1985)

Sophie Cisco, Petitioner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (A & P Tea Company), Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

March 8, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Kanner, for petitioner.

Gregory D. Geiss, Swartz, Campbell & Detweiler, for respondent, A & P Tea Company.

Submitted on briefs December 12, 1984, to Judges ROGERS, CRAIG and DOYLE, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE DOYLE, March 8, 1985:

Sophie Cisco (Claimant) appeals from the decision of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee's decision terminating Claimant's benefits under Section 408 of The Pennsylvania Workmen's Compensation Act (Act).1

Claimant suffered a back injury on July 11, 1978, while employed at the A & P Tea Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases