GRANDINETTI v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.

Nos. 179 C.D. 1984, 180 C.D. 1984, 181 C.D. 1984, 182 C.D. 1984, 183 C.D. 1984, and 184 C.D. 1984.

87 Pa.Commw. 133 (1985)

Thomas D. Grandinetti, individually and for the class he represents, to wit, the professional employees of the School District of the City of Erie, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Barbara T. Kelley, individually and for the class she represents, to wit, the professional employees of the School District of the City of Erie, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. A. James Welch, individually and for the class he represents, to wit, the professional employees of the School District of the City of Erie, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Marijane E. Dillon, individually and for the class she represents, to wit, the professional employees of the School District of the City of Erie, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Margaret E. Sisson, individually and for the class she represents, to wit, the professional employees of the School District of the City of Erie, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent. Charlotte Dobbs, individually and for the class she represents, to wit, the professional employees of the School District of the City of Erie, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

January 22, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Levin, for petitioners.

No appearance for respondent.

Michael I. Levin, with him, William Fearen, Cleckner and Fearen, for intervenor, Erie School District.

Argued September 14, 1984, before Judges DOYLE, COLINS and PALLADINO, sitting as a panel of three.


OPINION BY JUDGE PALLADINO, January 22, 1985:

Petitioners in these consolidated cases are token unemployment compensation claimants who represent the members of the Erie Education Association (Union). In its decision below, the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirmed a referee's decision denying benefits under Section 402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law),1<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases