PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction for robbery in the first degree. He contends that the court erred in admitting evidence respecting his participation in two other robberies and in imposing a mandatory minimum sentence in accordance with ORS 161.610. We conclude that the court did not err in admitting the evidence and affirm the conviction.
The state concedes that the court erred in imposing a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment, because there...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
