1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 628 F.Supp.
  5. 628 F.Supp. 1188 (1985)
 

RUSH v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC.

No. 84 Civ. 3219 (RWS).

628 F.Supp. 1188 (1985)

R. Stockton RUSH, III, Plaintiff, v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC., and Scott Seskis, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 24, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lovell & Stewart, New York City, for plaintiff; Christopher Lovell, Victor E. Stewart, of counsel.

Gold, Farrell & Marks, New York City, for defendants; Martin R. Gold, Hugh M. McGovern, of counsel.

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff R. Stockton Rush III ("Rush") commenced this action against co-defendants Oppenheimer and Co., Inc. and Scott Seskis (collectively "defendants") seeking to recover for damages caused by the defendants' alleged violations of the federal securities laws, violations of New York State common law principles of fraud and breaches of fiduciary duty, and violations of Section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970. On July 19, 1985...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases