1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 700 P.2d
  5. 700 P.2d 1054 (1985)
 

SEASE v. TAYLOR'S PETS

Nos. A8107-04299; CA A29230 [control], A8107-04440; CA A29416.

700 P.2d 1054 (1985)

74 Or.App. 110

Shirley SEASE; Janice Sease; and Betty Nelson, Plaintiffs, v. TAYLOR'S PETS, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation; Robert Taylor and Joan Taylor and Perfected Pets, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Dba the Alley Cat Pet Center, Defendants, and Milbank Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation, Third-Party Defendant. Nora Thayer (Previously Known As Nora Woolcott); Paula Hill and D. Bradford Hill, Respondents, v. Perfected Pets, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Dba the Alley Cat Pet Center, Inc.; Taylor's Pets, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation; and Robert Taylor and Joan Taylor, Husband and Wife, Appellants, and Milbank Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation, Third-Party Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 5, 1985.

Review Denied August 8, 1985.

Reconsideration Denied July 26, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard L. Grant, Buell, Black & Dupuy, Portland, argued the cause for appellants Taylor's Pets, Inc., and Robert and Joan Taylor.

Patrick N. Rothwell, Portland, argued the cause for appellant Perfected Pets, Inc. With him on the briefs were Hallmark, Griffith & Keating, P.C., Portland.

Donald A. Greig, Portland, filed the brief for respondents. With him on the brief was McClaskey & Greig, Portland.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.

NEWMAN, Judge.

Defendants appeal judgments of $20,000 each for plaintiffs Nora Thayer, Paula Hill and Bradford Hill in a products liability action.1 Plaintiffs' actions had been consolidated for trial with a separate action of Shirley Sease, Janice Sease and Betty Nelson, who also obtained judgments against defendants but who settled pending appeal.

From the evidence the jury could have found these facts. On June 21, 1979, Janice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases