1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 618 F.Supp.
  5. 618 F.Supp. 1069 (1985)
 

FUSTOK v. CONTICOMMODITY SERVICES, INC.

No. 82 Civ. 1538(MEL).

618 F.Supp. 1069 (1985)

Mahmoud FUSTOK, Plaintiff, v. CONTICOMMODITY SERVICES, INC., Conticapital Management, Inc., Continental Grain Company, Walter M. Goldschmidt, Norton Waltuch, Tom Waldeck and Ivan Auer, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 20, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle, New York City, for plaintiff; Herbert Stoller, New York City, of counsel.

Sidley & Austin, New York City, for defendant Continental Grain Co.; Lawrence H. Hunt, Jr., David T. Pritikin, Marc J. Gottridge, New York City, of counsel.

Parker Auspitz Neesemann & Delehanty P.C., New York City, for defendant Walter Goldschmidt; Jack C. Auspitz, Hollis L. Hyans, New York City, of counsel.

LASKER, District Judge.

In another of a seemingly unending stream of motions by all parties defendants Walter Goldschmidt and Continental Grain Company ("ContiGrain") move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings dismissing Fustok's twenty-first claim. The facts in this action for fraud in connection with various silver transactions involving Fustok's commodity trading account with ContiCommodity Services, Inc. ("Conti") are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases