1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 607 F.Supp.
  5. 607 F.Supp. 999 (1985)
 

GRIFFITH LABORATORIES U.S.A., INC. v. POMPER

No. 83 Civ. 3934(MEL).

607 F.Supp. 999 (1985)

GRIFFITH LABORATORIES U.S.A., INC., a Delaware corporation, and Griffith Laboratories, Inc., an Illinois corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Richard POMPER, an individual, and Presco Food Products, Inc., a New York corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 3, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bell, Boyd & Lloyd, Chicago, Ill., and Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, New York City, for plaintiffs; Evan A. Davis, Douglas H. Meal, New York City, and John P. Scotellaro, Charles G. Albert, Chicago, Ill., of counsel.

Hall, Dickler, Lawler, Kent & Friedman, New York City, for defendants; Paul Sarno, New York City, of counsel.

LASKER, District Judge.

In an earlier opinion, we found defendants Richard Pomper and Presco Products, Inc. ("Presco") liable to plaintiff Griffith Laboratories U.S.A., Inc. ("Griffith") for violating a customer non-solicitation clause in a salesman-employment contract between Griffith and Pomper. See Griffith Laboratories U.S.A., Inc. v. Pomper, 577 F.Supp. 903 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem., 740 F.2d 954 (2d Cir.1984)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases