1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 601 F.Supp.
  5. 601 F.Supp. 983 (1985)
 

BRADSHAW v. VAN HOUTEN

Nos. Civ 83-1096 PHX VAC to CIV 83-1098 PHX VAC.

601 F.Supp. 983 (1985)

Gloria C. BRADSHAW, et ux., Plaintiffs, v. John H. VAN HOUTEN II, et al., Defendants. Jacqueline D. PEABODY, Plaintiff, v. John H. VAN HOUTEN II, et al., Defendants. Gordon L. BARTON, Plaintiff, v. John H. VAN HOUTEN II, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

February 5, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David D. Dodge, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiffs.

Evans, Kitchel & Jenckes, P.C., Phoenix, Ariz., for Merrill Lynch.

Sacks, Tierney & Kasen, Phoenix, Ariz., for Mehren.

Campana & Horne, Phoenix, Ariz., for Van Houten & Continental Arizona Consultants.

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HARDY, District Judge.

Plaintiff's amended complaint in CIV 83-1098 PHX VAC alleges various federal securities law violations and pendent state claims. The defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. has moved for summary judgment. The motion will be granted.

FACTS

Barton, the plaintiff, inherited a substantial amount of IBM stock. On the recommendation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases