1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 611 F.Supp.
  5. 611 F.Supp. 885 (1985)
 

REMUS v. AMOCO OIL CO.

Civ. A. No. 83-C-204.

611 F.Supp. 885 (1985)

Ralph REMUS, individually and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AMOCO OIL COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin.

June 24, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James S. Grodin, Grodin & Grodin, and George Kersten, Kersten & McKinnon, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff.

Stuart Parsons, Quarles & Brady, Milwaukee, Wis., Richard C. Godfrey, Frank Cicero, Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

DECISION and ORDER

TERENCE T. EVANS, District Judge.

This case concerns Amoco Oil Company's "discount for cash" (DFC) marketing program, which it introduced in Wisconsin in 1982. The plaintiff, Ralph Remus, is an Amoco dealer in LaCrosse, Wisconsin. Remus, and the class of similarly situated Amoco dealers throughout Wisconsin which he seeks to represent, challenges the aspect of Amoco's DFC program which calls for the collection of a credit card fee from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases