1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 626 F.Supp.
  5. 626 F.Supp. 837 (1985)
 

NAT. ADVERTISING CO. v. CITY OF BRIDGETON

No. 84-2089C(3).

626 F.Supp. 837 (1985)

NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BRIDGETON, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.

December 30, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick C. Dowd, Coburn, Croft & Putzell, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.

William A. Richter and W. Mark Rasmussen, Peper, Martin, Jensen, Maichel & Hetlage, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HUNGATE, District Judge.

"I love a billboard, I always will

Because a billboard gives me such a thrill.

When I was only a little child

A circus billboard drove me wild."

The Billboard March, by John N. Klohr.

Apparently, billboards have likewise attracted the attention of the Bridgeton City Council. This suit follows defendant's denial, pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases