Dominick GIACOBBE and Angelina Giacobbe, his wife
v.
CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al.
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 2, 1985.
December 2, 1985.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Timothy C. Bolton, Hal C. Pitkow and Daniel G. Childs, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.
John A. Fitzpatrick, Philadelphia, Pa., for Pittsburgh Corning Corp.
Edward Greer and Charles J. Kalinoski, Mesirov, Gelman, Jaffe, Cramer & Jamieson, Philadelphia, Pa., for GAF Corp.
G. Daniel Bruch, Jr., Swartz, Campbell & Detweiler, Philadelphia, Pa., for Pacor, Inc.
Krusen, Evans & Byrne, John Patrick Kelly and Michael O. Connor, Philadelphia, Pa., for Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
Peter P. Liebert, Philadelphia, Pa., for Fibreboard Corp.
Arthur Makadon, Philadelphia, Pa., for Raymark Industries, Inc.
Edmund K. John, West Chester, Pa., for Celotex Corp.
Peter J. Lynch, McCarter & English, Philadelphia, Pa., for Owens-Illinois, Inc.
Joseph H. Foster, White & Williams, Philadelphia, Pa., for H.K. Porter Co. Inc., Southern Textile Corp. and Forty Eight Insulations, Inc.
Fredric L. Goldfein, Ominsky, Joseph & Welsh, P.C., Philadelphia, Pa., for Garlock, Inc.
John F. Ledwith, Philadelphia, Pa., for Keene Corp.
Walter D. Meeley, Philadelphia, Pa., for Nicolet, Inc.
John F. Kent, Philadelphia, Pa., for Armstrong World Industries.
Edward R. Grant, Philadelphia, Pa. by Stuart A. Law, Jr. and Joseph D. Olivieri, for Uniroyal Inc.
Joseph F. Moore, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. by Thomas McGarrigle, for Celotex Corp., Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Keene Corp., Eagle-Picher Ind., Fibreboard Corp., Owens-Illinois, Inc., H.K. Porter Co., Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. and Southern Textile Co.
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
MEMORANDUM
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
Defendant Owens-Illinois, Inc. has filed a motion for summary judgment with affidavit, deposition and answers to interrogatories attached. As a basis for summary judgment, Owens-Illinois claims that the statute of limitations bars the plaintiffs' claims. Plaintiffs have filed an answer and memorandum of law in opposition to defendant's motion with depositions and answers to interrogatories attached.
...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
