1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 619 F.Supp.
  5. 619 F.Supp. 710 (1985)
 

WELLS FARGO & CO. v. WELLS FARGO CONST. CO.

No. CIV 84-2387 PHX CLH.

619 F.Supp. 710 (1985)

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, and Donald Lee Husk and Kathleen Karen Husk, individually and/or as a partnership, dba Wells Fargo Construction Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

October 1, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Streich, Lang, Weeks & Cardon, Phoenix, Ariz., Flehr, Hohbach, Test Albritton & Herbert, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Albert E. Van Wagner, Jr., P.C., Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HARDY, District Judge.

In this action for trademark infringement and unfair competition, the plaintiffs have moved for a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendants from using the words "Wells Fargo" in connection with their business. The motion will be granted. This memorandum shall constitute the findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

In 1852 Wells Fargo...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases