LEE v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COM'N

No. 84 Civ. 3407 (PNL).

614 F.Supp. 634 (1985)

Homer LEE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, and J. Michael Quinlan, Respondents.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 5, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Homer Lee, pro se., petitioner.

Henry J. Sadowski, Regional Counsel, U.S. Parole Com'n, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondents.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LEVAL, District Judge.

Pro se petitioner, Homer Lee, seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He claims that the actions of the United States Parole Commission in setting his presumptive parole date constituted an abuse of discretion and a violation of the Ex Post Facto clause. The Commission moves to dismiss.

Facts

In January, 1982, Lee pleaded guilty in the Southern District of Florida...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases