1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 606 F.Supp.
  5. 606 F.Supp. 640 (1985)
 

VINTILLA v. U.S. STEEL C.P. FOR EMPLOYEE P.B.

Civ. A. No. 83-1034.

606 F.Supp. 640 (1985)

Ray E. VINTILLA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION PLAN FOR EMPLOYEE PENSION BENEFITS, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

April 18, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis X. Cook, John R. Vintilla, Cleveland, Ohio, Gerard F. Wrabley, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

James P. Carney, Patrick Ritchey, Reed Smith Shaw & McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

OPINION

WEBER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have brought an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. to recover pension benefits they claim defendant is wrongfully withholding. Defendant1 admits withholding the full amounts in question, but responds that ERISA does not prohibit its actions. Both sides have moved for summary judgment. At the outset, we find this case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases