1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 601 F.Supp.
  5. 601 F.Supp. 531 (1985)
 

UNITED STATES SHOE CORP. v. HACKETT

No. 84-C-0176.

601 F.Supp. 531 (1985)

The UNITED STATES SHOE CORPORATION, an Ohio Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Patrick A. HACKETT and Rosemary H. Hackett, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin.

January 15, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary P. Lantzy, Kohner, Mann & Kailas, S.C., Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff.

Michael A. Bowen, Foley & Lardner, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendants.

CASE STATEMENT

WARREN, District Judge.

This is a collection action based on diversity jurisdiction. Defendants responded to plaintiff's complaint by moving to dismiss on the ground that the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiff resisted and by cross-motion seeks summary judgment. Both sides have filed extensive briefs and affidavits, and the Court has heard oral argument...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases