TIMKEN CO. v. LINDLEY

No. 84-990.

17 Ohio St. 3d 85 (1985)

TIMKEN COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. LINDLEY, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 15, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Day, Ketterer, Raley, Wright & Rybolt and John F. Buchman, for appellee.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and James C. Sauer, for appellant.


FORD, J.

R.C. 5701.03 reads in pertinent part: "As used in Title LVII of the Revised Code, `personal property' includes every tangible thing which is the subject of ownership, whether animate or inanimate, other than patterns, jigs, dies, or drawings, which are held for use and not for sale in the ordinary course of business * * *." (Emphasis added.) As to the definition of the terms "patterns," "jigs" and "dies," the Revised Code is silent. Appellant contends...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases