1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 611 F.Supp.
  5. 611 F.Supp. 344 (1984)
 

AMARNARE v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC.

No. 83 Civ. 4742.

611 F.Supp. 344 (1984)

Tanyah Naomi AMARNARE, Plaintiff, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 10, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tanyah Naomi Amarnare, pro se.

Mary E. Baker, Thomas W. Smith, New York City, for defendant.

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

In this action against the defendant, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. ("Merrill Lynch"), the plaintiff, Tanyah Amarnare, alleges that Merrill Lynch was her "joint employer" with Mature Temps, Inc. ("Mature Temps"), not named as a defendant, and that Merrill Lynch violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 19641 by discharging her from her temporary job because of her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases