1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 300 Md.
  5. 300 Md. 643 (1984)
 

BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS v. CAM CONST.

No. 95, September Term, 1983.

300 Md. 643 (1984)

480 A.2d 795

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF FREDERICK COUNTY v. CAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

August 24, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Branko Stupar, Potomac (Lawrence E. Speelman, Frederick, on the brief), for appellant.

J. Richard Margulies, Baltimore (Herman M. Braude, William M. Huddles and Braude, Margulies, Sacks & Rephan, Chartered, Baltimore, on the brief), for appellee.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON, RODOWSKY and COUCH, JJ., and CHARLES E. ORTH, Jr., Specially Assigned Judge (Retired).

RODOWSKY, Judge.

Arbitrability is the issue on this appeal. The prime contractor on a building construction project demanded arbitration with the owner. Part of the recovery sought by the prime consists of losses allegedly suffered by subcontractors. Because there is no privity of contract between the owner and subcontractors, the owner denies that the arbitration agreement in the prime construction contract is one to arbitrate "subcontractors' claims." We shall reject...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases