1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 585 F.Supp.
  5. 585 F.Supp. 348 (1984)
 

BRADLEY v. MILLIKEN

Civ. A. No. 35257.

585 F.Supp. 348 (1984)

Ronald BRADLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. William G. MILLIKEN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D.

April 24, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George T. Roumell, Jr., Thomas M.J. Hathaway, Riley & Roumell, Detroit, Mich., Gerald Young, Paul J. Zimmer, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., State of Michigan, Lansing, Mich., for School Bd.

Theodore Sachs, Detroit, Mich., for Union.

William Waterman, Pontiac, Mich., for LULAC.

Thomas I. Atkins, Gen. Counsel, N.A.A. C.P., Brooklyn, N.Y., Duane Elston, Detroit, Mich., Paul R. Dimond, O'Brien, Moran & Stein, Ann Arbor, Mich., for N.A.A. C.P.

Before FEIKENS, Chief Judge, and CHURCHILL and COHN, District Judges.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, Chief Judge.

On April 13, 1983 we ordered a hearing on the future of the Court's Monitoring Commission and the manner of assuring compliance with orders in this case relating to the educational components.

The order was prompted by our concern over the environment in which the Monitoring Commission appeared to be operating. We are of the opinion that implementation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases