1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 193 N.J.
  5. 193 N.J. Super. 701 (1984)
 

HUPP v. ACCESSORY DISTRIBUTORS, INC.

193 N.J. Super. 701 (1984)

475 A.2d 679

KEITH HUPP, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ACCESSORY DISTRIBUTORS, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ARAI HELMET, LTD., THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 4, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur N. Chagaris argued the cause for appellant (Chagaris & Safro, attorneys).

Dennis M. Toft argued the cause for respondent Keith Hupp (Wolff & Samson, attorneys; Douglas P. Black, on the brief).

Wayne D. Greenfeder argued the cause for respondent Arai Helmet, Ltd. (Schwartz & Andolino, attorneys).

Before Judges ARD, MORTON I. GREENBERG and TRAUTWEIN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MORTON I. GREENBERG, J.A.D.

Defendant Accessory Distributors, Inc. (ADI) appeals from an order for summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Keith Hupp in an action on a Hawaii judgment and an order dismissing its third party complaint against Arai Helmet, Ltd. The issues involved in this matter relate to the validity of the Hawaii judgment and Arai Helmet's liability to ADI for contribution and indemnification.

In 1967...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases