1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ill.
  4. 125 Ill.
  5. 125 Ill. App.3d 720 (1984)
 

OKO v. ROGERS

No. 3-83-0479.

125 Ill. App.3d 720 (1984)

466 N.E.2d 658

JUNE OKO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JAMES ROGERS, M.D., Defendant-Appellee.

Appellate Court of Illinois — Third District.

Opinion filed July 18, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis S. Goldstein & Associates, of Chicago (David A. Novoselsky, of counsel), for appellant.

James D. Rogers, of Joliet, for appellee, pro se.

Judgment affirmed.

JUSTICE HEIPLE delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal arises out of a medical malpractice action brought by the plaintiff, June Oko, against the defendant, Dr. James Rogers, who appeared pro se. The complaint alleged that the defendant was negligent in performing hemorrhoid surgery on the plaintiff. A jury verdict was returned in favor of the defendant.

The issues on appeal concern whether the plaintiff was denied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases