1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 681 P.2d
  5. 681 P.2d 119 (1984)
 

WILLIAMS v. HARRSCH

TC 80-07-7839, CA A21608, SC 28852.

681 P.2d 119 (1984)

297 Or. 1

John S. WILLIAMS and Mary Lou Williams, Respondents On Review, v. Joseph A. HARRSCH, Mary Lou Harrsch, Tony C. Juarez and Cora D. Juarez, Petitioners On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided April 24, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Cramer, Burns, argued the cause for Petitioners on Review. With him on the briefs was Cramer & Pinkerton, Burns.

Claud A. Ingram, Salem, argued the cause for Respondents on Review.

Before LENT, C.J., and LINDE, PETERSON, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS and CARSON, JJ.

CARSON, Justice.

This is an action in equity to establish two roadway easements across defendants' land.1 Plaintiffs claimed public as well as private easements, on the alternative theories of reservation, implication and prescription.2 Defendants petitioned for review of the Court of Appeals' opinion affirming a decree which effectively declared that the public and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases